March 11, 2014 – 3:02 am | No Comment
Any habit that is done out of the intention to cure the body of any problems is a good habit. Yoga is one such habit that is mainly for the people to have good health and a flawless complexion. There is a certain charm about clear complexions and yoga helps to attain this with simple everyday routine and genuine healthy patterns. Yoga routine only paves the foundation for a great skin type and has  [...]

Read the full story »

Home » Research

During A Transplant, Why Not Just Replace Both Lungs?

Submitted by on April 24, 2009 – 12:18 amOne Comment

The widely acclaimed Johns Hopkins Institute has performed a large amount of research over the last several years that have been of tremendous help when it comes to saving an individuals life. Adding to their long list of other helpful research findings there has been a new study recently performed. The research has concluded that when a patient was in desperate need of a lung transplant, the advantages that they could benefit from could as much as double their life expectancy if they were to be able to have both of their lungs replaced, instead of just the one. There are an endless number of patients all around the world who are presently on waiting lists for this type of transplant because this specific organ can offer a great length of time for extended life periods for individuals who have sarcoidosis, emphysema, cystic fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other diseases that cause serious problems in the lungs. When only one lung is replaced it can often cause problems because of partial remnants of the disease being left behind in the other lung. This is a problem that can easily be fixed by simply replacing both of the organs. A set of lungs that have come from the same donor are also beneficial because they having already been working together as a pair.

In a perfect world this would be an awesome option to offer to patients who are suffering. However, we do not live in a perfect world and the option is simply impossible in most cases. The reason for this is the fact that there are far less organ donors than what are actually needed. Because of the shortage of this organ it just makes much more sense to save two lives by giving each individual one lung, rather than saving one life by giving them both of the lungs.

Many people would agree that taking advantage of being able to save more individuals would be the smartest option to choose. However, when one of your loved ones or family members is one of the patients involved it is not such a matter of fact question to answer.

If you have been a victim of clinical negligence during your surgery and you are looking for advice on compensation claim click here

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Popularity: 5% [?]

One Comment »

  • Dorothy L says:

    Hello…It is a very sad situation when a person is in need of a lung or a heart. As you mentioned in your post …there are just not enough matching donors waiting in line.
    It is even worse in Canada where the waiting lists can go anywhere from 5 -10 years for an organ.
    It is so important to practise and maintain a healthy diet and life style and hopefully avoid having to be stuck in this situation.

    Dorothy L’s last blog post..

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

CommentLuv badge